Teachers' Perceptions on Student Leadership Traits And Potentials in Malaysian Secondary Schools
Persepsi Guru tentang Sifat dan Potensi Kepemimpinan Siswa di Sekolah Menengah Malaysia
Abstract
Student leadership is seen to be one of the crucial issues in educational leadership field due to its impact on students, especially for the secondary and tertiary level students. Traits of student leaders are being investigated as one of the factors contributing to the effectiveness of student leadership in school. Categorised as one type of school leadership, student leadership is considered very beneficial for personal development of self-confidence and self-esteem as well as very prudent for the nation. The main purpose of this study is to investigate teachers’ perceptions on student leadership - its definition and benefits - and the shared traits possessed by student leaders. There were two theoretical frameworks used in this study. The first framework is by Northouse (2004) on Traits of a Good Leader, and the second is by Kozes and Posner (2012) on Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership. This qualitative study involved eight respondents who are secondary school teachers from various schools and age groups, using convenience sampling. Semi-structured interview was used in order to gain the teachers’ perceptions. The data was analysed using descriptive thematic approach. The findings revealed that there are ten shared traits of student leaders which are closely related to Northouse’s (2004) traits on good leaders and one concluded definition of student leadership also came out as a result.
References
Archard, N. (2009). Leadership understanding and practice in girls’ schools: A review of web-based public documents. Leading and Managing, 12(2), 16-30.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Bennis, W. (1989). Why leaders can't lead (pp. 118-120). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bisland, A. (2004). Developing Leadership Skills in Young Gifted Students. GiftedChild Today, 27(1), 24-27.
Brower, R. E., & Balch, B. V. (2005). Transformational leadership & decision making in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bunn, D., Cohen, K., Browning, P., Hamilton, I., Prowd, C., Ashley-Cooper, W., ...Kenny, A. (2010). Learning to lead: Eight schools share their approach to developing leadership capacity in students. Independence, 35(1), 8-23.
Chapman, J., & Aspin, D. (2001). Schools and the learning community: Laying the basis for learning across the lifespan. In D.S. Aspin, J.D. Chapman, M. Hatton & Y. Sawano (Eds.), International handbook on lifelong learning part 2 (pp.405-446), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Daft, R. L. (2005). The leadership experience (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
Davidson, C. & Tolich, M. (2003). Social science research in New Zealand: Manypaths to understanding. Auckland: Pearson.
Dempster, N., & Lizzio, A. (2007). Student leadership: Necessary research. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 276-285.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Pleiss, M. K. (1994). Leadership: A synthesis of social skills, creativity, and histrionic ability? Roeper Review, 16, 292–293.
Fertman, C. A., & Van Linden, J. A. (1999). Character education for developing youth leadership. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 83(605), 9-15.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple intelligence reframed : Multiple intelligences for the21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Greenleaf, R. K., Beazley, H., & Beggs, J. (2003). The servant-leader within: A transformative path. New York : Paulist Press.
Hernon, P., & Rossiter, N. (2006). Emotional Intelligence: which traits are most prized? College & Research Libraries, 67 (3) 260-275.
Jago, A. G. (1982). Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management science, 28(3), 315-336.
Keow, C. L. (2008). Philosophy and education in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman.
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lavery, S. (2002). Student leadership in Catholic schools. Catholic School Studies, 75(2), 39-40.
Malaysia Education Blueprint (2015, p.9). Higher Education. Retrieved from https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/corporate/PPPM%20(PT)/4.%20Executive%20Summary%20PPPM%202015-2025.pdf
Morris, T. (1997). If Aristotle ran general motors. New York: Henry Holt.
Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (Vol. 48). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tuohy, D. (1999). The inner world of teaching: Exploring assumptions which promote change and development. London: Falmer Press.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Copyright (c) 2019 Nurul Mardhiah Mohd Nashuha, Haryati Bakrin, Amalia Mahmudah, Anik Isticharoh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.